Anton Ehrenzweig 19081966 the Hidden Order of Art 1970
Introduction Click here
History of agreement visual perception Click hither
Visual perception mechanisms and models Click here
Ecology psychological approaches to perception Click here
Conclusions Click here
References Click hither
INTRODUCTION
Psychology is the science of the heed and its functions, especially in relation to behavior. It covers human senses, perceptions, emotions, cognition and action and is based on empirical, objectively derived and verifiable evidence from observation, testing and evaluation of the human condition.
Arising out of natural philosophy in the late nineteenth century, it focused initially on the faculties of the mind and sought to understand how the physiological processes of the senses were translated by the brain into sensations and perceptions.
During the nineteenth century, experimental psychology began the study of how sensory experience is dependent on stimulation of the sense organs (Boring, 1990). Psychophysics is the link between physiology and psychology and has been of considerable importance in the gimmicky studies of aesthetics.
In the early twentieth century in Germany, Gestalt theory developed to cover the psychology of perception. It built on the concept that the whole is more than the sum of the parts; really, Gestalt postulated that the whole is different than the sum of the parts. This is a highly relevant concept for mural quality where aesthetic please derives from the whole landscape.
In the latter decades of the twentieth century, increasing numbers of psychologists reflected the growing customs concern for the surroundings and expanded environmental psychology into new areas of enquiry such as ecology attitudes, aesthetics, urban design, crowding, environmental stress, restorative influence of nature, coping with natural disaster management, ecology noesis and mental maps.
This theme examines various human being world views which grade the basis of perception. An historical briefing is followed by a review of visual perception mechanisms and models and a summary of environmental psychological approaches to perception. The contemporary contributions made by environmental psychology to perception are reviewed. The relevance to mural of the perception theories is reviewed.
HISTORY OF Agreement VISUAL PERCEPTION
Plato, Aristotle and Euclid
Plato believed that the eye projected a fiery emanation outwards to objects in view where this fire coalesced with the object, and sensations were thus conveyed to the mind (Uttal, 1983). Aristotle roundly rejected Plato's emanation model, instead arguing that vision resulted from an emanation from the object beingness transmitted to the centre where it was captivated. Plato'south emanation theory blocked progress in the agreement of perception until about k AD when discoveries of the physics of light shifted the focus to the Aristotelian theory. Parallels can be drawn betwixt these theories with the philosophy of beauty, contrasting beauty beingness an objective physical quality (cf Plato's fiery emanation) versus beauty being in the centre of the beholder (cf Aristotle's absorption past the eye).
The mathematician, Euclid, established seven postulates which provide the footing of geometrical optics and form perception. Ane of these is the police of visual angle or retinal size: The things seen under a larger angle announced larger, those under a smaller bending appear smaller, and those under equal angle appear equal. (Uttal, 1983).
The influence of anatomical studies by Arab scholars together with increasing interest in Euclidean geometrical and perception models led to the flourishing of scientific and creative endeavors during the Renaissance. Perspective in painting was understood for the first time. Kepler (1571 – 1630) solved the problems of optics as applied to the retinal epitome and permanently laid Plato'south emanation theory to rest. Rene Descartes (1596 – 1650) dissected an ox'southward eye and detected an image upon the retina when low-cal was passed through the lens. Rather than simply regarding sight equally the imprint of the concrete image upon the retina, Descartes realized that information technology is the result of encephalon activity, an intellectual bound that parallels the contemporary subjective view of aesthetics. He even proposed that some course of coding of the visual image occurred prior to its estimation by the brain.
The British empiricist philosophers, including Locke, Berkeley and Hume, addressed visual perception as a primal question of philosophical enquiry. In his famous volume Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision (1709), Berkeley argued that as vision provides only 2-dimensional images, it is inadequate for correctly perceiving the world and that the process of association is necessary. He differentiated between mediate visual stimuli which included depth perception, and firsthand or innate stimuli, such equally width or color. Perception of mediate stimuli required indirect evaluation, while immediate stimuli could exist perceived directly. Berkeley also believed that mediated precepts involve learning; for example, depth perception requires tactile experience.
Both Descartes and Kant disputed the empiricist's view that the heed was a tabula rasa (bare slate), Descartes arguing that it possessed innate ideas about form, size and other backdrop of objects, while Kant believed the mind imposed its own internal conception of space and fourth dimension upon the sensory information it receives (Stone, 1984). The Gestaltists were the direct heirs of this arroyo. They argued that, although our senses perceive chaotic messages, there is a process of perceptual arrangement in the heed that brings club out of this chaos to organize them into distinct and segregated units such equally objects with specific shapes separated from a background.
Psychophysics
Knowledge of the beefcake and physiology of the brain increased during the eighteenth century. The theory of Johannes Muller (1801 – 1858) that sensations or signals encode the shape and quality of stimuli and passed from the retina to the brain transformed the debate from philosophy to science. He defined ten laws of the sensory procedure which can be summarized as three primary generalisations (O'Neil, 1977):
- Regardless of how a sense-receptor is activated – whether by light, sound, chemical substances, mechanical pressures or electrical stimuli – it will yield, if an feel results, a given type of 'secondary' quality;
- All that we are directly aware of in sensation is the country of the sensory nervus – the neurophysiological effect;
- Although sensations are subjective in that they are received by the senses, they seem objective.
Muller's laws dominated early experimental sensory psychology in the nineteenth century. Vision was regarded as a process within the encephalon and was analyzed in terms of neural networks.
In the nineteenth century, psychology sought to blueprint itself on the concrete sciences and hypothesized that at that place was a ane-to-one correlation betwixt experience of the external world and the stimulation of the listen. This was the constancy hypothesis – that given a detail stimulus, the aforementioned response will occur independent of other conditions (Wolman (a), 1973). Information technology parallels the principle of uniformitarianism in the world sciences, that the physical processes occurring today are identical to those that occurred in past ages. During the nineteenth century, the empirical approach dominated, based on assay of observable events and processes, resulting in attempts to understand the components of perception through an introspective method.
In the 2nd half of the nineteenth century, Hermann von Helmholtz (1821 – 1894) undertook extensive enquiry on sensory processes, perception and physiological optics. He believed that experience provides usa with the understanding of objects from which we infer their nature and described this unconscious inference: The sensations of the senses are tokens for our unconscious, information technology existence left to our intelligence to learn how to encompass their meaning (Rock, 1984).
The science of psychophysics originated in 1860 when the German language physicist, Gustav Fechner (1801 – 1887) published Elemente der Psychophysik in Leipzig. Psychophysics is the science of the measuring the influence of the information received by the senses (sight, sound, gustation, smell and touch) on the brain, connecting the publicly appreciable world and a person'due south privately experienced impression of information technology (Wikipedia, 2013). Building on previous work by Ernst Weber, his major contribution was the Weber-Fechner scale which quantified the human relationship between a awareness and the stimulus information technology provides to the encephalon; as the intensity of the awareness increased arithmetically, the stimulus increased geometrically: S = K log I (i.e. Awareness South = Constant Thousand multiplied by the logarithm of the Intensity I). Together with William Wundt (1832 – 1920) and Hermann von Helmholtz he established the scientific basis of psychology, overturning beliefs by Kant and others that it was impossible to quantify psychology.
Psychophysics of infinite perception is based on seeking correlations between the data received through retinal project and perception of the environment. This involves exhaustive inquiry of the stimuli. James Gibson, the foremost gimmicky advocate of this view, rejects the approach based upon the processing of individual chunks of information and postulates that information is viewed holistically every bit meaningful entities, paralleling the Gestaltists, who worked on the total image.
Atomistic (or structuralist) psychology taught that:
"all psychological facts (not merely those in perception) consist of unrelated inert atoms and that almost the but factors that combine these atoms and thus innovate activity are associations formed under the influence of mere contiguity" (Kohler, 1959).
This approach used analytic introspection to chronicle the association of experience to the stimulus energies they provoked. However, the atomistic approach could not explain depth and shape; neither could it explain meaning changes to a scene that result from changes in its parts.
Gestalt psychology
Gestalt psychology developed from the realization in the tardily nineteenth century that the atomistic approach to psychology and perception which reduced phenomena to their smallest possible quanta failed to explicate characteristics that could derive from the individual parts. This approach causeless that sense information comprised pointillist mosaic of bits and pieces that were and so aggregated into larger entities (Ehrenzweig, 1967). A like atomistic approach characterizes many contemporary landscape analyzes, east.m. Shafer et al, 1969, Daniel & Boster 1976, Dearden 1980. Typically these dissever a landscape into its constituent parts, appraise responses to the parts then recombine them.
In 1890, Christian von Ehrenfels identified the form quality or Gestaltqualitat equally a key attribute of features. Course qualities are properties of a whole or an entity which does non reside in its constituent parts (Wolman (a), 1973). A square is more than the sum total of four equal lines and iv right angles; its most important characteristic is its squareness. A melody is non merely a collection of notes but a set of certain notes in a detail guild and manner. If the relationship between the notes changes, so likewise does the tune, but significantly the melody is retained if information technology is transposed into another primal. Similarly, a foursquare shape retains its essential form regardless of size. Fractals have the same property of being an identical class at varying scales.An idea tin can be expressed in different languages but remain identifiable.
Thus the Gestaltqualitat is retained provided the relations between the elements remain unchanged. Transferability does non depend on having common elements, as under the atomistic approach, but rather they have similar formal or structural properties. Relationships of elements and transposability are primal properties of course qualities. Von Ehrenfels advocated the inclusion of class qualities along with sensations to understand the perception of forms, music and movement.
In 1900, Friedrich Schumann demonstrated the subtlety of grade qualities; for example, he showed that rotating a foursquare through 45º produces a diamond, notwithstanding a foursquare but, in contrast to the stable and substantial square, a rather unstable frail form.
Abandonment of the constancy hypothesis followed enquiry by Max Wertheimer (1880 – 1943) at the University of Frankfurt and later together with Wolfgang Kohler (1887 – 1967) and Kurt Koffka (1886 – 1941). All iii rejected the atomistic approach.
In 1912, Wertheimer published the newspaper that gave birth to the Gestalt movement. It was a paper on the phi phenomenon – the projection of two slightly separated spots of light in succession on a screen to give the impression of a single spot of lite moving across the screen. Although the individual images remain stationary, there is an "apparent movement" that does non derive from a series of sensations simply is a new outcome from the effect of two stimulus events working in cooperation. The effect is similar to that of motion pictures where the viewer actually sees a serial of discrete images. Wertheimer deduced that the apparent movement was the effect of a sequence of successive images and that this occurred outside the perceptual field.
In the High german, "Gestalt" has two meanings (Kohler, 1947):
- It connotes a shape or form equally an attribute of things;
- It has the pregnant of a physical entity per se, that has, or may have a shape as i of its characteristics.
Kohler recognised, however, that the use of the term has extended well beyond the content of shape, such equally learning, recall, thinking, interim, and biology.
Wertheimer'south definition of Gestalt is broader and allows for its wider use:
"a whole whose characteristics are adamant, not by the characteristics of its individual elements, but by the internal nature of the whole" (Katz, 1950).
In contrast to the atomists, the Gestaltists fabricated arrangement the key. They examined the system of whole objects – music, forms, faces – concent-rating on mental processes as being dynamic, structural units rather than bundles of sensations linked past association or imagination. The Gestaltists likened the atomistic model to a telegraph exchange, and their own model equally the distribution of stresses on soap bubbling (Hochberg, 1974); the atomistic object containing myriads of operations each operating independently without affecting others, the Gestalt object comprising a course dependent totally on the contribution of each element to the whole.
Wertheimer, Kohler, Koffka and other Gestalt psychologists extended the approach to other areas of perception: problem solving, learning and thinking. Kurt Lewin applied it to social psychology, motivation and personality, Kohler to animal behavior, while others applied it to economical behavior and aesthetics. Rudolf Arnheim (1974) who was prominent in art and aesthetics considered that the foundations of our present knowledge of visual perception were laid down in the laboratories of the Gestalt psychologists.
The Gestalt approach of holistic perceptual processing, as singled-out from an elementalistic approach, has gained back up over contempo decades. Nevertheless, the dominant theories of course perception have tended to be elementalistic and neuro-reductionist in concept and language (Bruce & Green, 1990).
Behaviorism
Early on in the twentieth century, J. B. Watson adult behavioral psychology which replaced introspective terms such as sensations and perceptions with objectively observable discriminative responses (Bruce & Dark-green, 1990). The behavioral approach focused on observation of behavior rather than agreement internal processes. Contemporary psychology is still dominantly behavioral in orientation, although exact explanations of subjects' experiences are regarded every bit legitimate.
Whilst behaviorism developed in the U.s., the Gestalt psychologists in Europe developed the phenomenological arroyo (i.e. that perceptual experience was nativist, innate to the individual).
In the mid-twentieth century, greater recognition of the complexity of human perception saw growth in the transactional functionalism approach which emphasized perceptual experience in interpreting images, and the new expect which emphasized private differences in motivation, emotion and personality in influencing what is seen (Bruce & Green, 1990).
Information processing
From the 1950s, a revolution in psychology occurred as it moved from the behavioral approach to the cognitive information processing model, a shift from focusing on the external behavior to the internal processes inside the brain. Brains do not simply answer to the stimuli of the senses; they too process the information received and decide what to do and what to retain in memory. Neither the perceiver'southward visual experience nor his overt responses are immediate results of stimulation. They are consequences of processes, or a sequence of processes, each of which takes a finite corporeality of time (Haber & Hershenson, 1973)
During the 1950s and 1960s, psychologists viewed the brain as a figurer, with its various functions – input, cardinal processing, retentiveness, output (Effigy 1), but because the computer analogy does not explain how the process works, use of this analogy has diminished.
Just as the calculator codes information, stores and processes it and produces an output, so environmental information is received past the senses and then candy by various systems, including perception, sensory memory, brusk-term and long-term memory which transform the information and upon which the brain then acts. Visual information received by the eye is coded into electrical neural activities, which are stored by the brain and used, for example, in reading.
Human cognitive power relies on the encephalon's information processing capability and the knowledge it has stored in its brusque and long-term memory. The curt-term retention has a express chapters of about seven pieces of information, but the long-term memory appears to have no limit. Some models also include a sensory memory component which holds information from the senses for a very short flow before processing, and a working memory component.
There are many variations of the information processing model, just the common features are:
- Ecology inputs via the five senses;
- Sensory memory which processes the sensory information in 0.v – 3 seconds and transfers it to the short-term retention. Sensory memory besides selects information from the senses, for instance, focusing on one chat in a noisy room rather than on all the other conversations;
- Short-term memory and working retentiveness which receive the sensory information and gives it significant through organisation and inference, compares it with knowledge from the long-term memory, and if necessary, initiates action. The short-term retention retains information for only 5 – xv seconds after which it is either forgotten or transferred to the long-term memory (Table one). Repeating the information, such every bit rehearsing a phone number between looking it upwards and dialing it, appears to be essential for the data to be retained by the brusk-term retention. The elapsing of short-term memory is longer when rehearsal is used.
- Long-term memory, a permanent repository which passively holds acquired noesis. In that location is no practical limit to the chapters of long-term memory, the brain containing approximately 100 billion (10eleven) neurons each capable of storing a reasonable amount of information. Retrieval of information from long-term retentiveness is rapid, despite the billions of choices bachelor (Lindsay & Norman, 1977).
Table 1 Forms and functions of memories
The information processing approach to perception arose from the realization that a perceptual feel does not contain simply viewing an object or scene – which ends equally the viewing ceases – but includes the ongoing human processing at the source of the stimulation. This continuum of experience is a major assumption of the data processing approach. An illustration is the memories associated with going on a holiday, firstly, the anticipation, secondly the holiday, and thirdly the call back of it afterward. All comprise the vacation memory.
Figure 2 illustrates the components of the information processing model. It includes a separate cognitive processing component which some models include (eastward.g. jaredmgriffin. wordpress.com). Retentiveness is a storage function, non an executive function which logically must exist separate. Relatively little is known nearly the cognitive mechanisms involved in processing information at the various stages, although enquiry indicates that many parts of the brain are working conjointly and continuously – not separately and at different times. The procedure is not necessarily entirely linear as the model may suggest: different stages bear on i another (Spoehr & Lehmkuhle, 1982). The model differentiates between the reception of the sensory information and its immediate internal representation (Kant also distinguished betwixt the actual scene and the listen's middle representation of it). Although the model indicates that some information is lost through forgetting, some savants can call back every feature of houses on a route along which they walked decades previously. In addition, events which are no longer cognitively retrievable may be recalled through hypnosis so it is possible that null is lost.
By the latter twentieth century, information processing was the dominant psychological approach to perception.
Environmental psychology
Environmental psychology grew out of the piece of work of Edwin Boring at Chicago in the 1940s and in Kansas, the work of Roger Barker during the 1950s and 1960s at the Midwest Psychological Field Station. Boring and Baker initiated research into the influence upon people of their environs and "legitimized psychological research conducted in real-world settings also every bit in the psychological laboratory" (Holahan, 1982). Describing their work every bit ecological psychology they demonstrated that beliefs could not be predicted upon the ground of private differences in background or personality alone but had to take account of the environmental setting.
Various psychologists studied aspects of this and in the 1960s, these interests coalesced into the distinct and contained expanse of environmental psychology. This was applied in architecture, interior design and city planning. Nonetheless, professionals working in these areas were frustrated by the psychologist's disability to apply their limited research findings to practical issues of design. During the belatedly 1960s, growing numbers of psychologists reflected the increasing community business about the environment and extended environmental psychology into new areas of inquiry such equally environmental attitudes and perception, urban design, crowding, environmental stress, coping with natural disasters, environmental noesis and mental maps. By the 1970s, environmental psychology became an accustomed field within the social and behavioral sciences (Holahan, 1982).
A growing number of psychologists have studied human beliefs and environmental preferences inside an outdoor setting, where the complexity of the environs makes information technology difficult to evaluate the contribution of the diverse stimuli. An armory of sophisticated public survey instruments and statistical analysis tools have been developed to employ in such settings.
VISUAL PERCEPTION MECHANISMS AND MODELS
One of the consequences of psychophysical research is that its focus upon the processes and measurement of perception has been at the expense of inquiry into the content of perception – content complimentary understanding. An information-processing approach does non in itself demand attention to the perceived qualities of the visual earth. … many of the models … take no components that are concerned with the way things look (Haber & Hershenson, 1973). This qualification is important in the study of landscape.
In this section, the laws governing perception are summarized, the concept of visual space and perception of visual form examined, and the principles of perception defined. We start by looking at the physics of the eye.
Physics of the Eye
Of prime importance in viewing landscapes is the application of the information processing model to the dominant sense of sight. The following summarizes aspects of the physics of the centre. The concrete characteristics of the eye together with its neuro-physiology are not examined as in that location are many references available to provide details; for example, Chocolate-brown, Riggs & Hsia in Graham, 1965; Haber & Hershenson, 1973; Spoehr & Lehmkuhle, 1982; Bruce & Green, 1990.
Retinal Projection
The Lambert is the luminance of any extended source or surface emitting or reflecting one lumen per foursquare centimeter of its surface. This is equivalent to the luminance of a perfectly reflecting and diffusing surface at a distance of 1 centimeter from a indicate source of one candlepower. A millilambert is 0.001 Lambert (Graham, 1965).
The center responds to low-cal levels over a range of 1013 millilamberts (ml), extending from below the intensity of starlight on white newspaper (ten-6 ml), through moonlight on white paper (ten-2 ml), comfortable reading light (ane ml), sunlight on white paper (104 ml), a tungsten filament (107 ml), to the intensity of light on the surface of the sun (xten ml) (Graham, 1965).
The visual field of the human eye is about 200º, (i.e. extending slightly behind through peripheral vision) (Effigy 3). The normal visual vigil of the eye, the ability to resolve small stimuli, is 0.five seconds of arc, which is equivalent to a line 1mm wide at a distance of one kilometer (Day, 1969). Under platonic conditions, the eye can notice a candle at the distance of 31 miles (l km), and a 20 cent coin can be seen at vi miles (10 km) distance (Haber & Hershenson, 1973). Visual angles of some common objects: sun and moon 30 minutes of arc each, a thumbnail at arm'due south length is i.5º to 2º arc, a 4-letter word in a book at 50 cm is well-nigh 0.7º (Haber & Hershenson, 1973).
Eyes are in abiding movement, non just post-obit events in i's surrounds only also making small jiggling movements called physiological nystagmus. Several types of movements tin exist identified: i is very minor and fast with the eye moving in angles of 20 seconds of arc, 30 – lxx times a second; another is a large oscillatory motion; and yet another is a wearisome drift of a few minutes of arc one way or another. In that location are also rapid jerks, with an aamplitude of 5 minutes of arc, often correcting for the irksome drifts (Lindsay & Norman, 1977). In viewing a scene, the center moves in a series of detached jumps chosen saccades from ane part of the scene to another. This can occur 4 or five times per 2nd. Saccadic eye movements take about 200 milliseconds to complete.
Sensory information storage
At this stage, the multiple information outputs from the retina are coded "visually" for internal representation purposes. The nature of this coding and storage is not yet understood. The speed of saccadic movements of the centre gives the viewer well-nigh ¼ 2d in which to process the information prior to its transference to more permanent storage. The sensory information store is a very brusk-lived blazon of memory – perhaps 0.one – 0.five seconds. It enables visual information to be retained afterwards the discipline has disappeared (Spoehr & Lehmkuhle, 1982). Retention of such information by rehearsal cannot exist undertaken as it is in the short-term retentiveness store. More information is stored in the sensory data shop than can be extracted, implying some sort of limit by later stages. For example, the memory retains that which is of value (Lindsay & Norman, 1977).
Visual Image Representation
Information about the scene passes to the brusque-term memory and besides to the visual image's representation – the mind's eye of what is seen by the eye. Successive saccades of the scene are integrated with previous ones to construct an integrated image. This is not a photographic image but ane that
follows the rules of perceptual system. These include figure-ground segregation and the Gestalt perceptual laws which include proximity, similarity, symmetry, closure and continuation.
Perceptual Laws
Concept of Visual Angle (Euclid'due south Law)
Effigy 4 illustrates the concept of the visual angle. The angular size of the object is inversely proportional to the altitude of the physical object from the heart – this is Euclid's police of the visual angle. An object of given height will subtend a larger angle when viewed from nearby than when viewed from a more than afar location. Foreshortening occurs when an object such as a volume is not on a frontal plane (i.e. at right angles to the line of sight) but rather is angled backwards so that the epitome of the book is smaller and its shape distorted.This explains the convergence of parallel lines formed past roads, railways and fences, which are non on a frontal aeroplane and as well why the private components in an area of brick paving or leaves on the basis become increasingly compressed with distance. The visual bending subtended past the objects and by the separation of spaces betwixt objects decreases with distance (Rock, 1984).
The geometry of Euclid'south law is that for the visual bending Ø:
Tan Ø/ii = h/2d
where h is the size of the object and d is its altitude from the center
Where Ø is minor (i.e. so that tan Ø = Ø) and so Ø = h/d in radians or Ø = 57.3 h/d in degrees. Thus if Ø is 10º, this equation volition overestimate it by but ane% (Graham, 1965).
Law of Size Constancy (Emmert's Law)
Size constancy (i.e. an object is the same size regardless of the size of the image) links with the concept of shape continuance (i.e. that an object has the aforementioned shape despite changes in the shape of its prototype) and orientation constancy (i.eastward. that an object is the same despite its orientation).
Figure five Police of Size Constancy (Emmert'due south Law)
The law of size continuance (Figure 5) indicates that the perceived size of an object of constant angular size is directly proportional to its credible distance. The term 'apparent distance' means its perceived distance, which is not necessarily the same equally its actual distance. Similarly, size is as perceived rather than necessarily its actual size.
Visual Space
Perception of visual space is highly relevant to the perception of concrete landscapes every bit it involves the perception of various subtle cues (e.g. depth and perspective) which give the mural its characteristic dimensions. Iii-dimensional infinite is considered by some to be paralleled by an internal representation that orients visual objects and even imaginary objects, including the viewer'due south own body relative to the axes of this internal three-dimensional space (Attneave, 1972). A like view is that relations in perceived space decide perception; perceived space existence an internal representation of infinite that provides an internal frame of reference. There has been some experimental evidence in support of the idea of internal representation of three-dimensional space (Kaufman, 1979).
Berkeley (1709) believed that the depth in a scene was not based on anything in the scene itself; rather depth was learnt (e.g. tactually). Information technology is now known that Berkeley was wrong, in that cues in the scene indicate its depth. However, he was correct in that cues have to be learnt. Cues to depth in a scene include those shown in Figure 6.
The hidden figure in the interposition example in Figure half-dozen is considered to exist more than afar than the ane that hides it. The reason the interposition cue is seen as two circles rather than a circumvolve and a crescent is explained by the Gestalt police force of proficient continuation, which holds that we tend to minimize change or aperture. Hochberg estab-lished a similar principle – that when a figure allows for alternative descriptions, we perceive the simplest one (Kaufman, 1979). Interposition tin also enable i to judge the relative altitude of an object, in dissimilarity to its absolute or bodily distance. How distance is perceived and used to calibrate the representation of space is one of the challenges facing inquiry in perception.
There are additional cues to those illustrated:
- Aeriform perspective Afar objects are tinged with blue coloration such as the haze of altitude which is so evident in Australia. The cue involves conditions in which the requisite visual contrasts are absent (Graham, 1965).
- Detail perspective The loss of visible detail of afar objects because of limitations of visual acuity and the scattering of calorie-free by the atmosphere is known as item perspective. Detail perspective and aerial perspective were cues used by Leonardo da Vinci and other painters of the Renaissance to give the impression of depth in paintings (Rock, 1984).
- Texture gradient The prototype of a large number of regular textures receding into the altitude creates a gradient of epitome size (Bruce & Green, 1990).
- Shadows on the sides of hills and valleys provide an impression of depth; fastened shadows reflect the depth of within an object itself while bandage shadows are those that autumn on surrounding surfaces. Attached shadows requite a strong sense of depth, while cast shadows are somewhat divorced from the object itself and provide lilliputian or no cue to depth (Rock, 1984).
- Movement perspective This is a kinetic cue which involves distant objects appearing to exist nigh stationary when one moves past them, while nearby objects motion swiftly by. "Objects nearby seem to be moving away from you at a velocity that increases the closer the objects are" (Kaufman, 1979).
- Kinetic cues Movement provides data near depth and distance that is not evident from a single static view. People with monocular vision guess depth by motility.
- Familiarity of objects Familiar objects such every bit a person, a car, electricity pole or a tree tin can provide a yardstick against which the distance and size of other nearby objects tin can be estimated.
The presence of several cues provides the encephalon with potent evidence of depth, although the means by which cues are interpreted collectively is not understood.
Through working with pupil air pilots during the Second World War and finding that the tests for cues for depth gave no indication of their success or failure in the air, James Gibson realized that the traditional list of cues for depth was inadequate. He came to believe that the whole theory of depth perception was false. In its place, in 1950, he developed a ground theory of space perception, to exist differentiated from the traditional theory, which he termed air theory. He considered that at that place is literally no such matter as perception of space without the perception of a continuous groundwork surface (Gibson, 1979). Thus the world did not comprise bodies in the empty air (such every bit aircraft) but rather a bones surface with adjoining surfaces. The character of the visual globe was given not by objects but by the background of the objects. The parallel with the figure/ground principle of Gestalt psychology is obvious.
Perception of Visual Form
Definition of forms
The dictionary defines form as the visible attribute of a thing (Shorter Oxford Dictionary), but in psychological terms, information technology is hard to provide a precise, quantifiable definition. Uttal, an potency in perception research, admits that the scientific community has non succeeded in defining precisely what it is that we mean past the word 'course.' – We have progressed simply modestly beyond the Gestalt notion that course is 'any segregated whole or unit of measurement' (Uttal, 1983). At that place have been attempts to specify forms statistically as classes of forms. Following a comprehensive review of the literature, Zusne proposed as an interim definition "… form may be considered both a one dimensional emergent of its concrete dimensions and a multidimensional variable" (Uttal, 1983).
Figure-ground segregation
Homogeneous fields prevent discrimination of objects, although such fields are relatively rare in nature (e.thou. pitch-blackness night, dense fog, snow storm or sand storm). Objects are unremarkably seen against a background or a surface, providing an inhomogeneity in the retinal projection that results in a perceptual segregation of the visual field into effigy and footing. This is the first stage in the organization and synthesis of form.
Characteristics of the figure compared with the ground are summarized in Table 2. The construction of the figure derives from its contour; the force of its contour will determine the caste by which the effigy stands out from the basis.
Table 2 Figure and footing characteristics
Based on Haber & Hershensen, 1973; Bruce & Green, 1990; Graham, 1965.
Visual fields that are completely homogeneous are called Ganzfelds (due east.g. looking through a dense fog without borders, edges or brilliant areas). Closing the eyelids forms Ganzfelds, reducing stimulation – after a few minutes, the neural excitation leaving the retina is reduced to negligible levels. Ganzfelds research has shown the importance of spatial inhomogeneity – variations beyond the visual field, and temporal changes in the field. Contours or variations are indispensable for form perception.
Earlier reference was made to saccades (minor movements of the eye). Such movements enhance the sensitivity of the visual system (Haber & Hershenson, 1973). It has been plant that when the visual epitome upon the retina is stablized, perception diminishes chop-chop merely that perception is reinstated by move, by changing the stimulus over time or by brightening the luminance.
The research suggests that variation in stimulation of the retina is necessary for perception to occur.
Principles of Perception
Irvin Stone (1975) divers nine principles of perception. The term 'proximal stimulus' refers to the retinal image of a particular surface (i.e. that which the middle sees).
- The proximal stimulus array must be considered to be ambiguous as to what it represents in the world.
- Perception begins with a procedure of grouping and figure-ground organisation of the proximal stimulus.
- The organisation accomplished is based on a selection, decision, or preference for sure outcomes on the part of the perceptual system.
- The key events that pb to detail perceptions are not themselves subjectively experienced (i.e. they are non conscious).
- Every bit a rule, what is perceived does not simply correspond straight with the relevant feature of the proximal stimulus (e.thousand. perceived size with the object'southward visual bending).
- The facts of perception cannot be fully explained by the functioning of physiological detector mechanisms such as are triggered past a particular stimulus impinging upon the retina.
- What is perceived is by and large, although by no ways ever, veridical (veridical means truthfully reflecting the objective situation (rather than illusory).
- Perception generally is non influenced by knowledge (in contrast to sensory data) (i.e. what we perceive is not determined or afflicted by what is known about the object).
- Vision is dominant over other sense modalities and then that non only does information technology tend to determine what is perceived when a sensory conflict occurs, but it also tends to 'capture' and thereby distort the very feel of the object every bit given by that other modality.
In summary, what we see is perceptually organized and scaled, is the objective (non illusory) fact, is not influenced by prior knowledge, and takes priority coming from the other senses.
Ecology PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO PERCEPTION
The development of environmental perception grew out of the interest of psychologists in the environs in the 1960s and 1970s, although one of the earliest, James Gibson, began to develop his theory in the 1940s. The Gestalt theory is besides a precursor to environmental psychology. The Gestalt emphases on perception every bit a holistic process and on the dynamic, organizing aspect of perception accept influenced much of the later research and theorizing in this surface area (Holahan, 1982). Some of the following examples stray into the expanse of environmental aesthetics.
The term distal stimulus describes what is being viewed such as a mural, while proximal stimulus is the image of the view past the retina of the eye. A percept is the brain's reconstruction of the landscape.
James Gibson (1904 – 1979)
James J. Gibson'southward Ecological Theory proposes that environmental perception is entirely a function of the stimulation received from the environment (i.e. humans do not interpret and construct meanings from this interaction). In Gibson's terms, humans receive information direct from the surround and view it holistically as a meaningful entity rather than in a disaggregated way. An surroundings's permanent concrete backdrop are termed affordances, cogent the functional properties that an object affords (e.g. a sturdy, non-porous object with interior space affords shelter; apartment surfaces raised off the footing affords sitting). As we explore and experience an environment, we get aware of affordances that help us make utilise of the environment.
Gibson attributes the origin of the concept of affordances to Koffka, the Gestalt psychologist who described the "demand grapheme" of an object:
To primitive man each affair says what it is and what he ought to practise with information technology … a fruit says "Eat me"; water says "Beverage me"; thunder says "Fear me"; and woman says "Love me" (Gibson, 1979).
Gibson's concept is that perception is based upon the utilise of elements (i.e. their affordances) rather than their grade, color and other attributes. Buildings are not seen as forms but rather as functional spaces in which we work and alive. The surround offers affordances to animals or humans. Gibson states: This is a radical hypothesis, for it implies that the 'values' and 'meanings' of things in the environment can be straight perceived. Affordances are very varied:
"Surfaces afford posture, locomotion, collision, manipulation, and in general, beliefs. Special forms of layout afford shelter and concealment. Fires afford warming and burning. Detached objects – tools, utensils, weapons – beget special types of behavior to primates and humans."
Gibson believes that animals, including humans, accept evolved ways of detecting invariant information about the surroundings, which enables them to perceive affordances. These exercise not derive from memory but from the perceptual system, which has evolved to "resonate" with this information. Gibson leaves vague the notion of resonance (Bruce & Green, 1990).
Gibson's approach is a radical departure from the mainstream perceptual psychology.
"Traditional perceptual theory holds that perception is indirect and mediated by higher cognitive processes. We practise not 'merely see' the world merely actively construct it from fragmentary perceptual data. Gibson is a 'direct realist'. He holds that perception is direct and unmediated past inference and problem solving" (Bruce & Light-green, 1990).
His theory focuses attention on the environment but has mostly been regarded as inadequate to explain human/environs interactions. Jay Appleton'due south prospects and refuges may be regarded equally affordances.
Egon Brunswik (1903 – 1955)
Egon Brunswik's lens model of ecology perception describes the interpretative role the individual plays in perceiving a scene – a process whereby the scattered environmental stimuli (the objectively measurable characteristics of a scene) are recombined by the viewer as a lens focuses light. It emphasizes the individual'due south active estimation of sensory information received from the surroundings. Such data is never perfectly correlated with the existent environment and complex and sometimes misleading cues can be received (eastward.chiliad. the human center has to guess how far away an object is based upon the size of the object and the setting). Brunswik's model is as well known as a Probabilistic Functionalism model. Effigy 7 illustrates the lens model, showing the zones of ambivalence between the distal variable on the left and the sentence on the right.
Nosotros make a probabilistic estimate of the altitude that is a 'best bet'. Brunswik described information technology thus:
"The best (the private) can do is to compromise between cues then that his posit approaches the 'best bet' on the basis of all the probabilities or past relative frequencies or relevant interrelationships lumped together" (Ittleson, 1974).
Perception involves extracting useful cues from a scene of many potentially confusing cues. The individual thus plays an active office in interpreting information from the environs based on a repertoire of probabilistic statements from many settings. Every bit there are many possible environments, judgements about whatsoever detail environment cannot be absolutely certain – only probabilistic estimates.
While in that location are many representations of the model, all comprise the post-obit seven elements:
- The distal variable which is the object of view and of judgement;
- Cues or proximal variables;
- Judgement about the distal variable based on the cues;
- Cue validities betwixt the cues and the distal variable which are imperfect;
- Cue utilizations, besides imperfect, betwixt the cues and the judgement;
- Interrelationships between the cues;
- The relation between the cue and the sentence known as accuracy or achievement.
Figure eight illustrates the subjective assessment of a mural, through the integration of its distal and proximal cues to provide the observer's perception of the scene.
The probabilistic model is rather more than widely accustomed than Gibson's ecological model. Ames' transactional psychology takes Brunswik's model farther by emphasizing the dynamic and creative role of the individual in environmental perception. Each private builds a unique store of environmental interactions – "the earth each of united states knows is a world created in a large measure from our feel in dealing with the environment" (Holahan, 1982). The probabilistic model is a basis for enquiry on organism-surround relationships in which greater emphasis than is usual is placed on state of affairs sampling rather than subject sampling and then that the surround's influence on behavior might be amend understood.
Anton Ehrenzweig (1908 – 1966)
Ehrenzweig addressed aesthetics through combining the Gestalt and psychoanalytical approaches. He drew from Nietzsche's book, "The Origins of the Tragedy from the Spirit of Music" in which Nietzsche laid down the principles of Apollonian and Dionysian form.
While the Dionysian principle stands for chaos and devastation, the Apollonian stands for order and dazzler which "have been transfigured into the sublimity and grace of 'classical dazzler'." In Gestalt terms, this is equivalent to the functioning of the Prägnanz principle (see Gestalt section), bringing residuum and club.
The classical Apollonian order of landscapes has been very influential in public gustation since the eighteenth century when the "picturesque" way was introduced based on Italian art, in item, that of Claude Lorraine, who painted elegant pastoral landscapes of the golden classical age (run into theme: Mural art). The creation of imagined classical club from chaos and degradation, reflected the influence of the Prägnanz principle.
The Dionysian influence has the power to excite but after the excitement passes it can go ugly and "quondam fashioned," much similar Victorian wearing apparel and ornate mode of mode. Over time, still, the Prägnanz effect of "bump erasing" removes the unnecessary item and crystallizes a new, simple line and stylistic purity from the old, an example of skillful Gestalt. While Lorraine'southward exaggerated stylistic detailing of classical landscapes is no longer appreciated, a simplified form that captures the essential elements of his style continues to the nowadays solar day.
Daniel Berlyne (1924 – 1976)
In contrast to Gibson and Brunswik, Daniel Berlyne focused on neither the individual nor the surroundings in isolation but rather on their interaction. He found that aesthetic preferences are related to the complexity of a stimulus. Like an inverted U (∩), as complication of a scene increases so as well does its bewitchery up to a point beyond which increased complication is viewed every bit less pleasant. Many experiments have been undertaken to investigate the optimum levels of stimulation (Holahan, 1982). Berlyne suggests an environment's stimulation to derive from the characteristics which cause the observer to compare or investigate further – which he termed its collative stimulus properties. These properties include:
- Complexity – a large variety of elements in the display;
- Surprisingness – unexpected elements;
- Novelty – newness to the observer;
- Incongruity – something out of place.
These properties influence an observer's aesthetic judgements virtually a scene and likewise their desire to explore. Berlyne considered that artful judgements and exploration are a combination of two factors:
- Hedonic tone: degree of pleasantness or beauty;
- Uncertainty-arousal: the inverted U (∩).
Equally doubt increases, hedonic tone (i.due east. pleasantness) showtime increases then decreases (Effigy 9).
People announced happiest at intermediate levels of stimulation or uncertainty and exercise not like excessive stimulation or excessive arousal. Therefore, ane might look that landscapes that are intermediate in complexity, novelty, incongruity, and surprisingness would be judged the most beautiful, whereas landscapes that are low or loftier in these collative backdrop would be regarded as less attractive.
While Berlyne's theory has appeal, it is not supported by the evidence of viewing natural landscapes. Studies have supported the '∩' in relation to non-environmental stimuli (e.thousand. paintings, music) and mayhap for urban environments, however, Wohlwill, Kaplan and others fence that in natural environments, preferences increment linearly with complexity (Wohlwill, 1976). Somewhat surprisingly, the researchers plant information technology impossible to find natural scenes containing the caste of complexity comparable with the human-made surround at the upper cease of the calibration (Figure 10). In the mixed set up, the relationship did not appear to be consistently related to complexity.
The findings support inquiry findings (notably by Stephen and Rachel Kaplan) that the significant variable was between natural and human-made, there being a higher preference for natural scenes compared with human-made scenes. Joachim Wohlwill has considered the surroundings as a source of bear on producing feelings of pleasure or aversion. Stimulus attributes – complication, incongruity, novelty, familiarity and multifariousness produce these feelings. Wohlwill suggests that fittingness, or how well an element (e.thousand. a house) suits a certain setting (e.g. wilderness) is an additional collative property.
Stephen and Rachel Kaplan
Stephen and Rachel Kaplan employ an information processing approach to explain the interactions between humans and the landscape. The Kaplans hypothesize that "the perceptual process involves extracting information from one'southward surroundings" (Kaplan, Kaplan & Brown, 1989). They place four predictor variables, two of which (coherence and legibility) help in agreement the surroundings, and the other ii (complexity and mystery) encourage its exploration. The Kaplans contend that humans seek to make sense of the surround and to be involved in it.
Underlying the Kaplan's approach is an evolutionary view that man preferences derive from the adaptive value offered past particular settings (Kaplan, S, 1987). 1 of the supporting factors cited is the preference for savannah landscapes over other biomes found amidst young children (Balling & Falk, 1982). A further factor is that manipulated landscapes such as ornamental gardens and municipal parks tend to reverberate the scattered copse of a savannah landscape. A third strand of evidence cited by Kaplan is Appleton's prospect and refuge theory (1975), the notion of seeing without being seen, in which preferences are for those settings which provide advantage for hunting or hiding. The Kaplan's theory is detailed in Theory of Landscape Aesthetics.
CONCLUSIONS
A somewhat piecemeal picture of the psychology of perception emerges because perception has not had a unmarried stream of development growing and becoming more sophisticated in its evolution but rather is characterized past varying approaches. In more than recent decades, there has been considerable central research of the neurophysiology of perception, far removed from environmental perception. The affluence of competing theories of perception and ecology perception, in item, are indicative of any developing field of enquiry. It is doubtful whether this is likely to change shortly.
Regarding the contribution of psychology to the study of dazzler, Sachs (1951) remarked with prescience:
"The nifty majority of investigation about the nature of beauty has been piled up by metaphysical speculations or elaborated every bit part of some arrangement of philosophy. Every bit everyone knows, the arroyo by observation of facts and by experiment is a comparatively modern innovation, and this is especially true in matters apropos the heed; anything so evidently connected with a human's soul was considered the exclusive domain of philosophy, metaphysics and theology. Psychology, the latest of the tardily, was welcomed non too warmly when it tried to squeeze itself into an already overcrowded space. The bias of this present attempt (i.due east. Sachs' book) is conspicuously on the side of psychology, trying to get elbow-room for information technology, fifty-fifty at the price of some older occupants."
Despite being a relative newcomer compared with philosophy, psychology has contributed profound insights and cognition to the understanding of aesthetics.
REFERENCES
Aiken, S.R., 1976, Towards landscape sensibility. Landscape, xx:iii, 20 – 28.
Appleton, J., 1975, The Experience of Landscape. John Wiley, London.
Arnheim, R., 1949. The Gestalt theory of expression. Psychological Review, 56:two, 156-171.
Arnheim, R., 1960. Gestalten – yesterday and today. In: Henle, M., 1961. Documents of Gestalt Psychology. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Arnheim, R. 1966. Toward a Psychology of Art. Collected Essays. University of California Printing, Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Arnheim, R., 1970. Visual Thinking. Faber & Faber, London.
Arnheim, R., 1974. Art and Visual Perception – A Psychology of the Creative Centre. Academy of Californian Printing, Berkeley.
Asch, S. East., 1968, In: Sills, D.L., 1968. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
Attneave, F. 1972. Representation of physical space. In: Melton, A.W. & E.J. Martin (Eds), Coding Processes in Human being Memory. V.H. Winston, Washington, DC.
Avant, L.50. & H. Helson, 1973, Theories of Perception. In: Wolman, B.B. 1973. Handbook of General Psychology. Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Jersey.
Balling J.D. & J.H. Falk, 1982, Development of visual preference for natural environments. Env. & Behav, xiv:i, 5 – 28.
Berkeley, 1709. Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision.
Boas, F., 1955. Primitive Art. Dover Publications Inc., New York.
Boring, East.Chiliad., 1990. Psychology. Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago.
Bruce, V. & P. Green, 1990. Visual Perception – Physiology, Psychology and Ecology. 2nd Ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., New Bailiwick of jersey.
Bruce, K., 1996. Georgeson : 'Visual Perception'.
Daniel, T.C. & R.South. Boster, 1976. Measuring landscape esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Interpretation Method. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167.
Solar day, R.H., 1969. Homo Perception. John Wiley & Sons Aust. Pty. Ltd., Sydney.
Dearden, P., 1980. Landscape assessment: the last decade. Canadian Geog., 24:3, 316 – 325.
Duffield, B.S. & J.T. Coppock, 1975. The depiction of recreational landscapes: the office of a reckoner based information arrangement. Trans Inst Brit Geog, 66, 141 – 148.
Ehrenzweig, A., 1953. The Psycho-Analysis of Artistic Vision and Hearing: An Introduction to a Theory of Unconscious Perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, London.
Ehrenzweig, A. 1967. The Hidden Social club of Art: A Written report in the Psychology of Artistic Imagination. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.
Fechner, One thousand., 1860. Elemente der Psychophysik.
Gibson, J.J., 1979, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Gifford, R., 1987. Environmental Psychology, Principles and Practice.
Gleitman, H., 1981. Psychology, 4th Ed., Due west.Westward. Norton, New York.
Graham, C.H., North.R., Bartlett, J.L. Brown, Y. Hsia, C.M. Mueller, & L.A. Riggs, 1965. Vision and Visual Perception, In: Graham, C.H. (Ed), 1965. Vision and Visual Perception. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.
Haber, R.N. & M. Hershenson, 1973. The Psychology of Visual Perception. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, London.
Hamlyn, D.W., 1957. The Psychology of Perception – a Philosophical Examination of Gestalt Theory and Derivative Theories of Perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Hochberg, J., 1974. Arrangement and the Gestalt tradition. In: Carterette & Friedman. Handbook of Perception Volume one, Historical and Philosophical Roots of Perception, Bookish Press, New York.
Holahan, C.J., 1982. Environmental Psychology. Random House, New York.
Ittleson, W.H., 1974. An Introduction to Environmental Psychology.
Kaplan, S., 1987. Aesthetics, affect and cognition: environment preference from an evolutionary perspective. Env. & Behav., 19:one, three-32.
Kaplan, R., Kaplan S. & T. Brown, 1989. Environs preference: a comparing of four domains of predictors. Env. & Behav., 21:5, 509 – 530.
Katz, D., 1950. Gestalt Psychology: Its Nature and Significance. Greenwood Press Publishers, Connecticut.
Kaufman, L., 1979. Perception – The World Transformed. Oxford Academy Press. New York.
Koffka, M., 1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc, New York.
Kohler, Westward., 1947. Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. Liveright Publishing Co., New York.
Kohler, W., 1959, Gestalt psychology today, In: Henle, M., 1961. Documents of Gestalt Psychology. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Kreitler, H. & S. Kreitler, 1972. Psychology of the Arts. Knuckles University Press, Durham. N.C.
Lindsay P.H. & D.A. Norman, 1977. Homo Information Processing – An introduction to psychology. 2nd Ed., Academic Press, New York.
Lindzey, Grand., R.F. Thompson & B. Spring, 1988. Psychology. Worth Publishing.
Notterman, J.M. 1985. Forms of Psychological Inquiry. Columbia University Press, New York.
O'Neil, W.Thousand., 1977. Sensory psychology in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In: Day. R.H. & Chiliad.V. Stanley, Studies in Perception. University of Western Australia Printing/Monash University Publications Committee.
Pickford, R.W., 1976. Psychology, culture and visual art. In: Brothwell, D. (Ed), Across Aesthetics: Investigations into the Nature of Visual Art. Thames & Hudson, London.
Rock, I., 1975. An Introduction to Perception. MacMillan Publishing Co. New York.
Stone, I., 1984. Perception. Scientific American Library, New York.
Sachs, H., 1951. The Artistic Unconscious: Studies in the Psychoanalysis of Fine art. Sci-Art Publishers, Cambridge, Mass.
Shafer, E.L., J.F. Hamilton & E.A. Schmidt, 1969. Natural landscape preference: a predictive model. Jnl. Leisure Inquiry, one:one, one – 19.
Spoehr, Thou.T. & S.W. Lehmkuhle, 1982. Visual Information Processing. W.H. Freeman & Co. San Francisco.
Uttal, Westward.R., 1983. Visual Form Detection in 3-Dimensional Space. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., New Jersey.
Werthmeimer, M., 1974. The trouble of perceptual structure. In: Carterette, E.C. & G.P. Friedman, 1974. Handbook of Perception Volume 1, Historical and Philosophical Roots of Perception. Academic Press, New York.
Wohlwill, J.F., 1976. Environmental Aesthetics: the environment as a source of bear on. In: Altman, I. & J.F. Wohlwill, Human Beliefs and Environs: Advances in Theory and Research. Plenum Press, New York.
Wolman (a), B.B., 1973. Lexicon of Behavioral Science. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. New York.
Wolman (b), B.B., 1973. Handbook of Full general Psychology. Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Jersey.
Source: https://scenicsolutions.world/visual-perception-gestalt-and-color/
0 Response to "Anton Ehrenzweig 19081966 the Hidden Order of Art 1970"
Post a Comment